· Does Bernanke want to get taper started?
o He sure does. I explained at length when I summarized his Nov. 19th speech.
o He made it VERY clear they are worried about the “efficacy and risks” associated with QE. That’s a strong admission.
o He essentially begged the markets to put more weight on forward guidance over continued QE.
o He called the selloff in bonds last time he tried to taper “neither welcome nor warranted”.
o That statement alone, demonstrates how serious they were about starting taper.
o If you read the speech, there is NO DOUBT he’s anxious to get it started.
· Why do I think they’ll taper today?
o Bernanke tried to taper in Sept. floating the idea in June. He obviously wants to get it started.
o The 10yr yield gaped up from about 2% to 3% very quickly on his floating the idea. Thus they decided not to.
o Taper-talk by the media and Federal Reserve presidents have increased over the past couple of weeks yet…
o This time, the 10yr has remained stable currently trading at 2.885%. They HAD to have this to begin taper.
o The stock market has remained stable as well. But I believe 10yr stability is more important to the Fed right now.
o They have “talked” taper to death since June. Talk is cheap. It’s time to actually DO something.
o What more can be said? They’ve TALKED this thing to death. There is NOTHING NEW to say.
o They’ll never know what to expect from the market until they actually DO IT!
o What better time to do it then now. “If” a taper turns out to cause “unwanted” market moves, what better time to change your mind than with a new fed chairman.
o Can you imagine how bad it would look if Yellen started taper, causing huge market moves, forcing her to change her mind? She’d look ridiculous.
o However, as a new chairman, she can come in and say that her and the new vice chair disagreed, and pushed to have the levels reinstated to $85bil total, if not more.
o Something that has been missed by most of the media are the recent statements by several Fed presidents about how CLOSE the decision was in Sept.
o The dissenting president’s also said they have move “closer” to voting for a taper in the past couple of months.
o No one from the Fed really ever said that until recently. This suggests to me that it’s going to be “close” again, but to the taper side this time.
o The next FOMC meeting is January 29th 2014, Bernanke’s last meeting. And there is no press conference scheduled to follow.
o I can’t fathom the Fed would “start” a taper at a meeting where there will be a new chairman days later.
o And I can’t fathom the Fed would “start” a taper without having a press conference to explain why.
o That means the “possible” start of taper would be pushed to the next FOMC meeting on March 19th 2014.
o I don’t think there is anyway the Fed wants to wait until March to get this taper started.
· Why $10 billion?
o This was the number floated back in June.
o Any less, they’ll look silly.
o Anymore, and it could freak the markets out. No surprises!
· Why $10 billion from just treasuries?
o They do not want to do anything to hurt the housing “recovery”.
o Even today, and even though, housing starts hit a 5yr high, the Mortgage Bankers Assoc. applications index hit a 13yr low!!!
o This is an odd relationship, and it holds for mortgage “purchase” applications and starts as well.
o This is evidence of the huge numbers of homes being bought with CASH. And I think that also means investors. That’s not necessarily a good thing.
o That means less financed refi’s and purchases, both of which will be needed to free up consumer cash, and to continue the housing price recovery.
· Other Fed “qualifications”?
o Percentages! Treasury issuance and mortgage issuance has been decreasing over the past year.
o THUS, the Fed’s “percentage” purchases of outstanding issuance has actually been increasing! Most people miss this.
o THUS, even though they are tapering, the “actual” effect, due to lower issuance, will not be as large as the $10bil suggests.
o They’ll again STRESS the importance the market “should” put on their forward guidance of zerobound rates, and far less importance on their monthly purchases.
· Any more evidence?
o You bet! For anyone who watches CNBC, you’ll be familiar with their head economist Steve Liesman.
o But if not, suffice it to say he RARELY sticks his neck out. He ALWAYS plays it safe.
o Given that, Liesman did an about-face two weeks ago from a no-taper bias at this meeting to a taper bias.
o Rick Santelli described it perfectly, saying there’s no doubt Liesman has excellent access to Fed participants, and given his change of mind, he’s betting someone “whispered in his ear”.
o I totally agree with this. Liesman NEVER takes risks. And changing his stance weeks before the meeting is significant.
o I think he “knows”!
Randy Woodward
Managing Director, Fixed Income Capital Markets
One Burton Hills Blvd, Ste 225, Nashville, TN 37205
( Toll-Free 800.764.7621
6 Mobile 615.969.2682
Randy.Woodward@RaymondJames.com
Prepared for informational purposes only. Not an official confirmation of terms. Based on information generally available to the public from sources believed to be reliable. Changes to assumptions may materially impact returns. Past performances is not indicative of future results. Price/availability is subject to change without notice. This is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of an offer to buy a new issue. For further information on a new issue, including a prospectus, please contact your Raymond James salesperson. Raymond James & Associates, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Raymond James Financial, Inc.
